Library Search

In the News: Michigan Live February 27, 2026

As toxic coal ash contaminates Michigan water, Trump officials relax cleanup rules

Gavin Kearney, Attorney, Clean Energy Program: “Companies were free to store coal ash anywhere they wanted to, and oftentimes that just meant digging a hole in the ground and dumping it in.”

In the News: Grist February 24, 2026

The Supreme Court hears a Line 5 oil pipeline case with high stakes for treaty rights

Debbie Chizewer, Managing Attorney, Midwest Office: “This case is really about Michigan’s ability to protect the Great Lakes from an outdated Canadian oil pipeline that’s threatening to rupture.”

In the News: Los Angeles Times February 17, 2026

Supreme Court may block thousands of lawsuits over Roundup weed killer

Patti Goldman, Attorney, Northwest Office: “When people use pesticides in their fields or on their lawns, they don’t expect to get cancer. Yet this happens, and when it does, state court lawsuits provide the only real path to accountability.”

In the News: NPR February 12, 2026

Trump’s EPA will stop regulating greenhouse gases, setting up a legal fight

Abigail Dillen, President of Earthjustice: “We will see this administration in court, to ensure that our government does its job to protect us.”

In the News: Newsweek February 12, 2026

Trump Doesn’t Value American Lives. His New Pollution Policy Is Proof

An opinion piece by Abigail Dillen (President of Earthjustice), Amanda Leland (Executive Director of Environmental Defense Fund), Manish Bapna (President and CEO of NRDC), and Loren Blackford (Executive Director of the Sierra Club).

In the News: Forbes February 12, 2026

Trump Targets EPA Climate Authority

Christie Hicks, Managing Attorney, Clean Energy Program: “Taxpayers will be paying for this twice — in increased costs for electricity for the Department of Defense and the bailouts to keep those crumbling coal power plants running.”

In the News: The Guardian February 10, 2026

Republican House bill guts laws protecting U.S. consumers from toxic chemicals

Daniel Savery, Legislative Representative, Policy & Legislation: “Industry has said it has a ‘historic opportunity’ to revise TSCA, or gut it, as we believe it to be. It’ll be interesting to see what shade of lipstick they’re going to put on this pig to sell it to their constituents, who are rightly concerned about the…

In the News: WSUF February 8, 2026

DeSantis spent $573 million on immigration. The feds may never pay Florida back

Tania Galloni, Managing Attorney, Florida Office: “The fact is that just as the district court found, this facility required federal environmental review from the beginning because it’s an ICE detention center. No delay in disbursing federal funds affects that reality.”

In the News: The Rapid City Post January 21, 2026

Trump’s coal agenda could cut worker productivity, lifetime earnings

Thom Cmar, Deputing Managing Attorney, Midwest Regional Office: “The health benefits of fewer incidences of cancer, cardiovascular disease, less exposure to children of harmful levels of lead — those benefits far exceed the costs to the industry.”

In the News: Kiowa County Press January 20, 2026

Keeping Colorado’s coal plants projected to be costly for ratepayers

Michael Hiatt, Attorney, Rocky Mountain Office: “Propping up uneconomic coal plants, propping up the coal industry — while simultaneously taking efforts to stymie wind development, solar development — that’s going to impair grid reliability.”

In the News: KDVR January 20, 2026

Bills designed to spur data center development make waves at state capitol

Megan Kemp, Colorado Policy Advocate, Rocky Mountain Office: “I am shocked to see such generous tax exemptions being offered to corporations that very well should be made to be pay their way.”

In the News: Inside Climate News January 16, 2026

Will Trump’s Push to Drill on California Public Lands be More Successful This Time Around?

Michelle Ghafar, Attorney, California Regional Office: “They didn’t look at any of that new information or change of circumstances and analyze how any of that could change the impact that they identified.”

In the News: New Orleans Public Radio January 15, 2026

Parents worried proposed CO2 pipeline could have ‘catastrophic’ effects on nearby school, neighborhood

Cyndhia Ramatchandirane, Staff Scientist, Fossil Fuels Program: “What this report shows is that the pipeline would put these kids and teachers in harm’s way. There would be a very large cloud of CO2 that would cover the area, the houses, the school very quickly — within like 10 minutes.”

In the News: Reuters January 14, 2026

Environmental law group seeks probe of Meta’s $27 billion Louisiana data center financing

Susan Stevens Miller, Attorney, Clean Energy Program: “If Meta ends the lease after four years almost none of the costs of the generating station or the associated transmission will have been paid up by Meta at that point.”

In the News: Slate January 14, 2026

It’s Responsible for One of the Worst Oil Disasters Ever. It’s Counting On Trump to Let It Do It Again.

Sam Sankar, SVP of Programs: “The first Trump administration saw oil companies as its ‘partners.’ The second Trump administration treats them as its ‘customers.’”

In the News: Canary Media January 13, 2026

What a fracking-waste dispute says about Ohio’s energy double standard

James Yskamp, Attorney, Fossil Fuels Program: “The law is very clear in our view that [the department] should be applying the rules in place at the time of permitting.”

In the News: The Southern Maryland Chronicle January 13, 2026

EPA Delays Coal Plant Wastewater Rules

Thom Cmar, Deputing Managing Attorney, Midwest Regional Office: “It’ll cost all of us in the long run because it will encourage more expensive, dirty coal plants to continue operating for longer and it will mean more arsenic, mercury and lead in our waterways.”

In the News: The Washington Post January 12, 2026

EPA says it will no longer consider health costs in pollution regulations

Patrice Simms, VP of Litigation for Healthy Communities: “EPA uses the idea of ‘uncertainty’ here to justify its decision not to provide any monetized benefits of reducing pollution. But the result of this decision is effectively to assign a benefit of zero dollars to reducing these pollutants.”